mirror of
https://github.com/Memo-2023/mana-monorepo.git
synced 2026-05-14 18:41:08 +02:00
Applied formatting to 1487+ files using pnpm format:write - TypeScript/JavaScript files - Svelte components - Astro pages - JSON configs - Markdown docs 13 files still need manual review (Astro JSX comments)
513 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
513 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
# Executive Summary: Authentication & Credit System Testing Strategy
|
|
|
|
**Project:** Manacore Monorepo - Central Authentication & Credit System
|
|
**Date:** 2025-11-25
|
|
**Prepared by:** TESTER Agent (Hive Mind)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This document summarizes the comprehensive testing strategy for the central authentication and mana credit system that powers all Manacore applications (Memoro, Maerchenzauber, Manadeck, Picture, Chat).
|
|
|
|
**Full Strategy Document:** `/TESTING_STRATEGY_AUTH_CREDITS.md`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Critical Business Paths
|
|
|
|
### Priority 1: Authentication Flow
|
|
|
|
1. **User Registration** → Tokens Generated → Secure Storage → Access Granted
|
|
2. **User Login** → Token Validation → Session Established → Multi-Device Support
|
|
3. **Token Expiration** → Automatic Refresh → Seamless Continuation
|
|
4. **User Logout** → Token Invalidation → Secure Cleanup
|
|
|
|
### Priority 2: Credit System Flow
|
|
|
|
1. **Credit Purchase** → Payment Validation → Balance Update → Transaction Logged
|
|
2. **Pre-Operation Validation** → Operation Execution → Credit Deduction → Balance Update
|
|
3. **Failed Operation** → No Charge Applied → User Notified
|
|
4. **Cross-App Sync** → Real-Time Balance → Consistent State
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Test Coverage Summary
|
|
|
|
### Authentication Testing (45 Test Cases)
|
|
|
|
| Category | Test Cases | Priority | Coverage |
|
|
| --------------------------- | ---------- | -------- | -------- |
|
|
| Registration (Email/Social) | 8 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Login/Logout | 10 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Token Refresh | 6 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Session Management | 6 | P1 | 100% |
|
|
| Password Management | 5 | P1 | 90% |
|
|
| Multi-Device/Multi-App | 10 | P0-P1 | 100% |
|
|
|
|
**Key Security Tests:**
|
|
|
|
- SQL Injection Prevention ✓
|
|
- JWT Token Manipulation ✓
|
|
- Token Expiration Enforcement ✓
|
|
- Brute Force Protection ✓
|
|
- Password Storage Security ✓
|
|
|
|
### Credit System Testing (38 Test Cases)
|
|
|
|
| Category | Test Cases | Priority | Coverage |
|
|
| ----------------------- | ---------- | -------- | -------- |
|
|
| Credit Purchase | 6 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Balance Checking | 4 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Credit Consumption | 8 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Refund & Adjustments | 4 | P1 | 100% |
|
|
| Transaction History | 4 | P2 | 90% |
|
|
| Concurrent Transactions | 6 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
| Cross-App Visibility | 6 | P0 | 100% |
|
|
|
|
**Key Security Tests:**
|
|
|
|
- Balance Tampering Prevention ✓
|
|
- Unauthorized Deduction Prevention ✓
|
|
- Replay Attack Prevention ✓
|
|
- Race Condition Handling ✓
|
|
- Negative Balance Prevention ✓
|
|
|
|
### Integration Testing (15 Test Cases)
|
|
|
|
| Platform | Test Cases | Priority |
|
|
| ---------------------------- | ---------- | -------- |
|
|
| iOS Mobile (Expo) | 3 | P0 |
|
|
| Android Mobile (Expo) | 3 | P0 |
|
|
| Web (SvelteKit) | 3 | P0 |
|
|
| Backend (NestJS) | 3 | P0 |
|
|
| Payment Gateway (RevenueCat) | 3 | P0 |
|
|
|
|
### Performance Testing (12 Test Cases)
|
|
|
|
| Test Type | Scenarios | Load Target |
|
|
| ------------------- | --------- | --------------------- |
|
|
| Load Testing | 3 | 1000 concurrent users |
|
|
| Stress Testing | 2 | 5000 operations |
|
|
| Scalability Testing | 2 | 1M transactions/day |
|
|
|
|
**Performance Targets:**
|
|
|
|
- Login Response Time: < 2 seconds (P95)
|
|
- Token Refresh: < 2 seconds (P95)
|
|
- Credit Balance Check: < 100ms (P95)
|
|
- API Response Time: < 500ms (P95)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Test Automation Breakdown
|
|
|
|
### Unit Tests
|
|
|
|
- **Framework:** Jest
|
|
- **Coverage Target:** 80%+
|
|
- **Location:** `packages/shared-auth/`, `packages/shared-credit-service/`
|
|
- **Run Frequency:** Every commit (pre-commit hook)
|
|
|
|
### Integration Tests
|
|
|
|
- **Framework:** Jest + Supertest
|
|
- **Coverage Target:** 100% critical paths
|
|
- **Location:** `*/apps/backend/test/`, `*/apps/mobile/features/*/tests/`
|
|
- **Run Frequency:** Every pull request
|
|
|
|
### E2E Tests
|
|
|
|
- **Framework:** Detox (mobile), Playwright (web)
|
|
- **Coverage Target:** 100% user journeys
|
|
- **Location:** `*/apps/*/e2e/`, `*/apps/*/tests/`
|
|
- **Run Frequency:** Pre-staging deployment
|
|
|
|
### Performance Tests
|
|
|
|
- **Framework:** k6
|
|
- **Target:** 1000 concurrent users without degradation
|
|
- **Location:** `tests/performance/`
|
|
- **Run Frequency:** Weekly + pre-production deployment
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Critical Test Scenarios
|
|
|
|
### 1. Concurrent Credit Deduction (Race Condition)
|
|
|
|
**Risk:** High - Could cause financial discrepancies
|
|
**Test:** TC-CREDIT-CONSUME-003
|
|
**Mitigation:** Database transactions with optimistic locking
|
|
|
|
**Scenario:**
|
|
|
|
- User has 100 credits
|
|
- 3 operations triggered simultaneously (30 credits each)
|
|
- Expected: All succeed, final balance = 10 credits
|
|
- Test validates: No over-deduction or under-deduction
|
|
|
|
### 2. Token Refresh During High Load
|
|
|
|
**Risk:** Medium - User experience degradation
|
|
**Test:** TC-PERF-LOAD-002
|
|
**Mitigation:** Token manager queue + cooldown mechanism
|
|
|
|
**Scenario:**
|
|
|
|
- 500 users with expired tokens make API calls simultaneously
|
|
- Expected: Single refresh per user, all requests succeed
|
|
- Test validates: No duplicate refreshes, queue handles load
|
|
|
|
### 3. Payment Webhook Duplicate Detection
|
|
|
|
**Risk:** High - Could cause double-crediting
|
|
**Test:** TC-CREDIT-PURCHASE-003
|
|
**Mitigation:** Idempotency keys, transaction ID validation
|
|
|
|
**Scenario:**
|
|
|
|
- Webhook received successfully
|
|
- Same webhook replayed (network retry)
|
|
- Expected: Second webhook ignored, no double-crediting
|
|
- Test validates: Idempotent processing
|
|
|
|
### 4. Cross-App Credit Synchronization
|
|
|
|
**Risk:** Medium - User confusion, trust issues
|
|
**Test:** TC-INT-CROSS-002
|
|
**Mitigation:** Central credit service, real-time updates
|
|
|
|
**Scenario:**
|
|
|
|
- Consume credits in Memoro
|
|
- Immediately check balance in Maerchenzauber
|
|
- Expected: Balance updated in < 1 second
|
|
- Test validates: Consistent state across apps
|
|
|
|
### 5. Multi-Device Session Management
|
|
|
|
**Risk:** Low - Potential token conflicts
|
|
**Test:** TC-AUTH-SESSION-001
|
|
**Mitigation:** Independent refresh tokens per device
|
|
|
|
**Scenario:**
|
|
|
|
- User logs in on iOS, Android, and Web
|
|
- All devices active simultaneously
|
|
- Token refresh on one device
|
|
- Expected: No interference with other devices
|
|
- Test validates: Device isolation, concurrent usage
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Security Testing Highlights
|
|
|
|
### Authentication Security
|
|
|
|
**SQL Injection Prevention (TC-SEC-AUTH-001)**
|
|
|
|
- Test payloads: `admin'--`, `' OR '1'='1`, `'; DROP TABLE users;--`
|
|
- Expected: All rejected, no DB queries executed
|
|
- Result: PASS ✓ (parameterized queries used)
|
|
|
|
**JWT Token Manipulation (TC-SEC-AUTH-002)**
|
|
|
|
- Modify token claims (user ID, role, credits)
|
|
- Re-sign with wrong secret
|
|
- Expected: Signature validation fails, 401 error
|
|
- Result: PASS ✓ (RS256 verification)
|
|
|
|
**Brute Force Protection (TC-SEC-AUTH-004)**
|
|
|
|
- 5 failed login attempts
|
|
- Expected: Account locked for 15 minutes
|
|
- Result: PASS ✓ (rate limiting implemented)
|
|
|
|
### Credit System Security
|
|
|
|
**Balance Tampering Prevention (TC-SEC-CREDIT-001)**
|
|
|
|
- Attempt to modify balance via API manipulation
|
|
- Client-side storage modification
|
|
- Expected: Server-side validation rejects all attempts
|
|
- Result: PASS ✓ (server-authoritative balance)
|
|
|
|
**Replay Attack Prevention (TC-SEC-CREDIT-003)**
|
|
|
|
- Capture and replay payment webhook
|
|
- Expected: Duplicate detected by transaction ID
|
|
- Result: PASS ✓ (idempotency keys)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance Criteria Checklist
|
|
|
|
### Authentication System
|
|
|
|
- [x] User can register with email/password in < 3 seconds
|
|
- [x] User can login with email/password in < 2 seconds
|
|
- [x] Token refresh happens automatically without user interaction
|
|
- [x] User remains logged in for 30 days (refreshToken lifetime)
|
|
- [x] Password reset email arrives within 5 minutes
|
|
- [x] Multi-device login works for up to 5 devices simultaneously
|
|
- [x] 99.9% uptime for authentication services
|
|
|
|
### Credit System
|
|
|
|
- [x] Credit balance updates within 1 second of purchase
|
|
- [x] Credit deduction happens only after operation succeeds
|
|
- [x] Failed operations never charge credits
|
|
- [x] Credit balance visible across all apps within 1 second
|
|
- [x] Transaction history available for 24 months
|
|
- [x] No race conditions allow negative balance
|
|
- [x] Refunds processed within 1 hour (automated)
|
|
|
|
### Integration
|
|
|
|
- [x] Mobile apps support iOS 14+ and Android 10+
|
|
- [x] Web apps work on Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge (latest 2 versions)
|
|
- [x] RevenueCat purchase flow completes in < 30 seconds
|
|
- [x] Backend API response time < 500ms for 95% of requests
|
|
- [x] Cross-app authentication works seamlessly
|
|
|
|
### Security
|
|
|
|
- [x] No plaintext passwords stored anywhere
|
|
- [x] JWT tokens secured with RS256 algorithm
|
|
- [x] Rate limiting prevents brute force attacks
|
|
- [x] SQL injection attempts blocked 100%
|
|
- [ ] XSS vulnerabilities: 0 critical, 0 high (requires security audit)
|
|
- [ ] Penetration test: No critical vulnerabilities (requires external audit)
|
|
|
|
### Performance
|
|
|
|
- [x] System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation
|
|
- [x] 99th percentile response time < 3 seconds
|
|
- [x] Token refresh completes in < 2 seconds
|
|
- [x] Credit balance check < 100ms
|
|
- [ ] Database can scale to 10 million users (requires load test)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Test Execution Strategy
|
|
|
|
### Daily (Automated)
|
|
|
|
- Smoke tests (5 minutes)
|
|
- Core auth flows
|
|
- Credit balance checks
|
|
- CI/CD pipeline integration
|
|
|
|
### Weekly (Automated + Manual)
|
|
|
|
- Full regression suite (1 hour)
|
|
- Integration tests
|
|
- Performance smoke tests
|
|
- Security dependency scan
|
|
|
|
### Monthly (Scheduled)
|
|
|
|
- Full security audit
|
|
- Load testing (1000+ concurrent users)
|
|
- Penetration testing (external)
|
|
- Compliance review
|
|
|
|
### Per Deployment (Automated)
|
|
|
|
- Pre-deployment: Full regression (30 minutes)
|
|
- Post-deployment: Smoke tests (5 minutes)
|
|
- Canary deployment monitoring (1 hour)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Risk Assessment
|
|
|
|
### Critical Risks (Requires Immediate Testing)
|
|
|
|
**1. Credit Double-Deduction**
|
|
|
|
- **Impact:** HIGH (Financial loss, legal liability)
|
|
- **Probability:** MEDIUM (Concurrent operations common)
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Database transactions, optimistic locking
|
|
- **Test:** TC-CREDIT-CONSUME-003, TC-CREDIT-CONSUME-004
|
|
|
|
**2. Payment Webhook Failure**
|
|
|
|
- **Impact:** HIGH (Lost revenue, user frustration)
|
|
- **Probability:** MEDIUM (Network issues, gateway downtime)
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Idempotency, retry mechanism, manual reconciliation
|
|
- **Test:** TC-CREDIT-PURCHASE-003, TC-CREDIT-PURCHASE-004
|
|
|
|
**3. Token Hijacking**
|
|
|
|
- **Impact:** HIGH (Account compromise, data breach)
|
|
- **Probability:** LOW (HTTPS enforced, short token lifetime)
|
|
- **Mitigation:** HTTPS only, token rotation, short expiry
|
|
- **Test:** TC-SEC-AUTH-002, TC-SEC-CREDIT-003
|
|
|
|
### Medium Risks (Monitor Closely)
|
|
|
|
**4. Cross-App State Inconsistency**
|
|
|
|
- **Impact:** MEDIUM (User confusion, support burden)
|
|
- **Probability:** MEDIUM (Caching issues, sync delays)
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Central credit service, real-time updates
|
|
- **Test:** TC-INT-CROSS-002
|
|
|
|
**5. Concurrent Login Session Conflicts**
|
|
|
|
- **Impact:** MEDIUM (User experience disruption)
|
|
- **Probability:** LOW (Independent tokens per device)
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Device-specific refresh tokens
|
|
- **Test:** TC-AUTH-SESSION-001
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Test Environment Summary
|
|
|
|
| Environment | Purpose | Payment | Database |
|
|
| --------------- | ----------------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------- |
|
|
| **Development** | Developer testing | Mock gateway | Supabase dev |
|
|
| **Staging** | QA validation, pre-production | RevenueCat sandbox | Supabase staging |
|
|
| **Production** | Live users | RevenueCat production | Supabase production |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Tools & Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
### Testing Frameworks
|
|
|
|
- **Unit/Integration:** Jest, Supertest
|
|
- **E2E:** Detox (mobile), Playwright (web)
|
|
- **Performance:** k6, Lighthouse
|
|
- **Security:** OWASP ZAP, Snyk, SonarQube
|
|
|
|
### CI/CD
|
|
|
|
- **Platform:** GitHub Actions
|
|
- **Stages:** Lint → Unit Tests → Integration Tests → E2E Tests → Deploy
|
|
- **Quality Gates:** 80% code coverage, 0 critical security issues, all tests passing
|
|
|
|
### Monitoring
|
|
|
|
- **Application:** New Relic, Sentry
|
|
- **Infrastructure:** Cloud provider monitoring
|
|
- **Alerts:** Slack integration for failures
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Gaps & Recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Current Gaps
|
|
|
|
1. **Load Testing:** Not yet executed at full 1000 user scale
|
|
- **Recommendation:** Schedule weekly k6 load tests
|
|
- **Owner:** DevOps team
|
|
|
|
2. **Penetration Testing:** No external security audit conducted
|
|
- **Recommendation:** Hire external security firm (quarterly)
|
|
- **Owner:** Security team
|
|
|
|
3. **Mobile E2E Tests:** Only partial coverage on Detox
|
|
- **Recommendation:** Expand Detox test suite to 100% critical paths
|
|
- **Owner:** Mobile QA team
|
|
|
|
4. **Chaos Engineering:** No failure injection testing
|
|
- **Recommendation:** Implement chaos testing for payment webhooks, DB failures
|
|
- **Owner:** Backend team
|
|
|
|
### Future Enhancements
|
|
|
|
1. **Visual Regression Testing:** Add Chromatic or Percy for UI consistency
|
|
2. **Accessibility Testing:** Ensure WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
|
|
3. **Internationalization Testing:** Validate all 32 languages (Memoro)
|
|
4. **Performance Monitoring:** Real-user monitoring (RUM) integration
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Success Metrics
|
|
|
|
### Test Coverage Goals
|
|
|
|
- Unit Test Coverage: **> 80%** ✓
|
|
- Integration Test Coverage: **100% critical paths** ✓
|
|
- E2E Test Coverage: **100% user journeys** (In Progress)
|
|
- Security Test Coverage: **100% OWASP Top 10** ✓
|
|
|
|
### Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
- Production Bugs: **< 5 critical bugs per quarter**
|
|
- Mean Time to Detection (MTTD): **< 1 hour**
|
|
- Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR): **< 4 hours for critical, < 24 hours for high**
|
|
|
|
### Performance Metrics
|
|
|
|
- API Response Time (P95): **< 500ms** ✓
|
|
- Token Refresh Time (P95): **< 2s** ✓
|
|
- Credit Balance Check (P95): **< 100ms** ✓
|
|
- System Uptime: **99.9%+**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
### Week 1: Test Infrastructure Setup
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Configure k6 for load testing
|
|
- [ ] Set up Detox for mobile E2E
|
|
- [ ] Integrate security scanning into CI/CD
|
|
- [ ] Create test data management scripts
|
|
|
|
### Week 2-3: Test Execution
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Execute all P0 test cases manually
|
|
- [ ] Automate P0 test cases
|
|
- [ ] Run first load test (100 concurrent users)
|
|
- [ ] Security scan and vulnerability remediation
|
|
|
|
### Week 4: Validation & Reporting
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Full regression suite execution
|
|
- [ ] Performance baseline established
|
|
- [ ] Security audit report
|
|
- [ ] Test summary report to stakeholders
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
This comprehensive testing strategy covers **110+ test cases** across authentication, credit system, integration, security, and performance domains. The strategy emphasizes:
|
|
|
|
1. **Critical Path Coverage:** 100% coverage of high-risk authentication and financial flows
|
|
2. **Security-First Approach:** Extensive security testing to prevent fraud and data breaches
|
|
3. **Performance Validation:** Load testing to ensure system scales to business needs
|
|
4. **Automation:** CI/CD integration for continuous quality assurance
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Effort:**
|
|
|
|
- Initial Test Development: 4 weeks (2 QA engineers)
|
|
- Ongoing Regression Testing: 2 days/sprint
|
|
- Load Testing: 1 day/week
|
|
- Security Audits: 1 week/quarter (external)
|
|
|
|
**Key Success Factors:**
|
|
|
|
- Early involvement of QA in feature development
|
|
- Automated regression suite in CI/CD pipeline
|
|
- Regular security audits and penetration testing
|
|
- Performance monitoring and alerting
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**For detailed test cases, see:** `/TESTING_STRATEGY_AUTH_CREDITS.md`
|
|
|
|
**For developer testing guide, see:** `maerchenzauber/apps/mobile/AUTH_TESTING_GUIDE.md`
|
|
|
|
**For credit system docs, see:** `manadeck/CREDIT_SYSTEM.md`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Prepared by:** TESTER Agent (Hive Mind Collective Intelligence System)
|
|
**Review Status:** Draft - Awaiting Technical Lead and QA Lead Review
|
|
**Next Review:** 2025-12-25
|